Horizon3 alternatives: NodeZero rivals by price unit
Horizon3.ai sells NodeZero, autonomous software priced per discovered asset: $15, $50, $65 or $85, plus $10,000 per app for its web module. Alternatives split into custom-quote platforms (Pentera, XBOW), per-test AI services (Hadrian, Intruder) and consultancies. Prices use different units, so convert before you compare. Checked on 9 November 2026.
Horizon3 alternatives depend on what you are replacing. NodeZero is autonomous software priced per discovered asset, so its closest rivals are other platforms, and per-test AI services or consultancies are a different product class. This page groups four alternatives from the provider dataset by delivery type and price unit, using vendor pages checked on 9 November 2026.
Why do teams look for Horizon3 alternatives?#
Three reasons come up in the dataset notes. The first is the price unit. NodeZero bills per asset, and an asset is a discovered server, device, cloud resource or service. Your total depends on an asset count that is not known in advance.
The second is scope. The pages checked do not mention mobile testing, and they describe no human review of findings. The third is evidence: Horizon3 publishes no sample report.
None of this makes NodeZero a poor fit. The dataset describes it as a fit for security teams that test internal and external networks, cloud and Active Directory often and can count their assets.
How does Horizon3 sell NodeZero?#
NodeZero covers internal, external, cloud (AWS and Azure) and Kubernetes pentests, plus a newer web application module. List prices are public on the pricing page.
| Plan | Price | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Flex | $15 | per asset, per test (12-month term) |
| Core | $50 | per asset, annual subscription |
| Pro | $65 | per asset, annual subscription |
| Elite | $85 | per asset, annual subscription |
| WebApp Flex | $10,000 | per app, per test (12-month term) |
Core adds scheduling and unlimited testing. Pro adds tripwires and rapid response. Elite adds insights, high-value targeting, advanced data pilfering, threat actor intelligence and vulnerability prioritization. Support tiers cost extra: Enhanced is 10% of the subscription, minimum $7,500 per year, and Premier is 20%, minimum $25,000 per year.
Worked price example
A team has 500 assets. Core costs 500 x $50 = $25,000 per year. Elite costs 500 x $85 = $42,500. A 10% Enhanced support tier on Core adds $2,500, but the stated minimum is $7,500, so the support cost is $7,500. This is arithmetic on list prices, not a quote.
The full breakdown is on our Horizon3 pricing page.
Which alternatives fit by delivery type?#
Group the options by who or what does the testing.
| Type | Examples from the dataset | Price model |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomous platform, custom quote | Pentera, XBOW | No price published |
| AI service, per-test price | Hadrian, Intruder | Per test |
| AI service, per-assessment price | Aikido | Per assessment |
| Human-led consultancy or platform | See the provider list | Mostly quote-only |
NodeZero is a different product class from a consultancy. A platform runs repeated tests on your assets for a subscription. A consultancy sells a scoped engagement and a report. Pick the class first, then compare vendors inside it.
For platform comparisons, our Pentera alternatives and NodeZero vs Pentera pages already cover that ground. We link to them and do not repeat them here.
What do the closest alternatives say about themselves?#
Pentera sells the Pentera Platform with Core (internal), Surface (external) and Cloud modules, plus AI-native web app and API testing and human-led adversarial testing. It lists no prices. Its homepage offers only "Talk to an Expert" and a demo. It states no turnaround and offers no sample report.
XBOW runs many AI agents against web applications and APIs and validates findings with exploits. Its pricing is usage-based with no unit or amount. It describes first validated findings in hours, and free, unlimited retests. See the XBOW alternatives and XBOW vs Horizon3 pages.
Hadrian lists Nova tests from EUR 1,250 per test, excluding VAT. Its scope names web applications, and one test is not defined. Intruder lists $3,500 per test, a $12,000 four-test pack, and $4,000 on its AI Pentesting page. Its AI pentest covers web apps only and offers unlimited retesting on the single test and the pack. Aikido lists $4,000 per assessment and $50 to $30,000+ for Rightsized. See Aikido pricing.
How do the options compare side by side?#
| Provider | Delivery | Published price | Unit | Sample report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) | Automated software | $15 to $85; $10,000 | per asset; per app | Not published |
| Pentera | Platform plus human-led services | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| XBOW | Autonomous agents | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Hadrian | AI agents, human-reviewed | From EUR 1,250 (excl. VAT) | per test | Not published |
| Intruder | AI agent test | $3,500; $4,000 | per test | Not published |
| Aikido | AI agents | $4,000; $50 to $30,000+ | per assessment | Public (network, mobile, AI) |
"Not published" means the vendor's pages do not show the item. It may still exist on request.
Which alternatives publish prices, and how do you choose by scope and budget?#
Hadrian, Intruder and Aikido publish prices you can use for a budget. The per-asset and per-test units do not convert directly. A 500-asset network at $50 per asset is $25,000 a year of unlimited testing. A $4,000 web app test is one scoped run.
Use this decision order:
- Network, cloud or Active Directory coverage, tested often: look at platforms (NodeZero, Pentera).
- One web app or API before a release, with a fixed price: look at per-test services (Hadrian, Intruder, Aikido).
- A named human reviewer or an auditor-facing report: ask providers for a sample report first, and see the sample report guide.
Check the pentest cost guide for how units differ. Each vendor's scope and price can change, and the dates above are the check dates. Send a correction if a vendor page now differs.
Questions
Why do teams look for NodeZero alternatives?
The usual reasons are the price unit and scope. NodeZero bills per discovered asset, so the total depends on an asset count you may not know. The pages checked also do not mention mobile, human review of findings or a sample report. Teams that want a per-test price or a human reviewer look elsewhere.
Is NodeZero a pentest company?
It is software. The dataset describes NodeZero as a platform that runs the attacks itself, with no human pentesters described on the pages checked. A consultancy sells people's time and a report. These are different product classes, so compare their outputs as well as their prices.
Which alternatives publish a price?
Hadrian lists from EUR 1,250 per test, excluding VAT. Intruder lists $3,500 or $4,000 per test. Aikido lists $4,000 per assessment and $50 to $30,000+ for Rightsized. Pentera and XBOW publish no price. Units differ, so a lower figure does not mean lower cost.
Do the alternatives cover internal networks?
Pentera's pages describe internal, external and cloud modules. Hadrian, Intruder and XBOW name web applications and, for XBOW, APIs on the pages checked. Their network scope is unknown or not stated, so ask each vendor to confirm it in writing.
Sources
- NodeZero pricing (checked 9 November 2026)
- NodeZero WebApp (checked 9 November 2026)
- Horizon3.ai homepage (checked 9 November 2026)
- Pentera homepage (checked 9 November 2026)
- Hadrian pricing (checked 9 November 2026)
- Hadrian Nova (checked 9 November 2026)
- XBOW pricing (checked 9 November 2026)
- Intruder pentest pricing (checked 9 November 2026)