Social engineering testing companies: compared
Social engineering penetration testing tries to trick staff into giving up information or access, through email, phone calls, messages or in person. Agree rules of engagement, HR and legal sign-off and how results are reported before the test. The table lists providers that state this service, sorted A to Z, with price and sample report status as published.
Social engineering penetration testing checks whether people and procedures resist a trick, such as a fake email, a call to the help desk or a visitor who asks for a door to be held open. This page lists providers whose own pages state social engineering as a service. Facts come from the PentestCompare dataset, checked on 9 November 2026, sorted A to Z. Excession Labs (publisher of this site) appears only where its dataset row matches.
26 of 26 providers shown (67 in the full table). Sorted A to Z, not ranked. Checked up to 9 November 2026.
| Provider | Delivery | Web apps | APIs | Cloud | Network | Mobile | AI apps | Published price | Turnaround | Retest | Sample report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-LIGNConsultancy | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | Custom quote | Not published | Not stated. The page mentions RADAR monitoring between annual tests… | not published |
| Bishop FoxOffensive security consultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not published | Not published | Not published | not published |
| BreachLockPTaaS platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Pentests can be scoped and started within 24-48 hours. | Free manual retests: 1 (Standard), 2 (Extended), custom (Extensive).… | on request |
| BridewellCyber security services provider | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not published | on request |
| ClaranetManaged services and cyber security provider | human-led | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Not published | Retesting is included as part of the engagement. | not published |
| Compass SecurityConsultancy, Switzerland | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not published | on request |
| CYBRIPenetration testing consultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $5,000 starts at, per engagement +3 more | From 5 business days (Web Application and Custom), 10 (Web, API,… | Remediation testing is included in the $9,500 and $20,000 tiers.… | not published |
| DeepStrikePenetration testing consultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Basic plan: start pentest within 48 hours. | The services page says free unlimited re-testing; the pricing page… | not published |
| Halo SecurityPTaaS platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Not published | One round of retesting is included; Halo verifies fixes and issues… | not published |
| Integrity360Cyber security services provider, Ireland | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Not published | Continuous retest options are mentioned. | not published |
| JUMPSECConsultancy, United Kingdom | human-led | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not stated. The page recommends testing quarterly or semi-annually… | not published |
| LRQA (Nettitude)Assurance and cyber security provider (Nettitude is now part of LRQA) | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Mobile tests: start within two weeks and usually at least three days… | Not published | not published |
| NCC GroupSecurity consultancy, United Kingdom | human-led | ? | ? | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | Not published | Not published | Not published | not published |
| NetSPIPenetration testing as a service (PTaaS) | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not published | Not published | Not published | not published |
| PacketlabsPenetration testing consultancy, Canada | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | The homepage says Packetlabs supports security teams with retesting;… | on request |
| Pentest PeoplePenetration testing provider (part of WorkNest Secure) | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not published | not published |
| Prescient SecurityConsultancy | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | from $6,000 per engagement (scope-based) +5 more | Not published | Cait: up to 2 retests within 30 days of each scan. No retest terms… | not published |
| RaxisConsultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Custom quote | Quote requests answered usually in one business day; PTaaS findings… | Retesting is built into the PTaaS workflow; Raxis Attack includes… | Public |
| Rhino Security LabsPenetration testing firm, United States | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Not published | Not published | Not published | Public |
| SchellmanConsultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not stated on the page. | Public |
| SecuritumConsultancy, Poland | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 640 EUR to 890 EUR per man day +1 more | Not published. Typical engagement length is 1 to 4 weeks for a… | Not published | Public |
| Software SecuredConsultancy, Canada | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Quote within 48 hours; scheduling in 3-6 weeks, sometimes sooner;… | Request retesting within 12 months of report delivery;… | not published |
| StingraiPenetration testing consultancy and platform, Canada | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | US$3,000 per assessment +1 more | Autonomous Pentest: same-day results. | Automated retests are listed on the Autonomous plan; the page says… | Public |
| SynackCrowdsourced platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $5,085 per test (starting price) +2 more | Test windows: 4-5 business days (Sara), 5 days (SynackST), 14 days… | Patch verification is listed as included in each product; the… | not published |
| TrustedSecSecurity consultancy, United States | human-led | ? | ? | Yes | ? | ? | Yes | Not published | Not published | Not published | not published |
| VumetricPenetration testing consultancy, Canada | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Most penetration tests can be performed within a couple of days, but… | Not stated | on request |
No provider matches every filter. Remove a filter to see more.
"?" means the provider does not say on its public pages. It does not mean "no". Prices use each provider's own unit: a test, a year, a month or credits. Do not compare them as equal units. How we collect and check this data.
What does social engineering testing cover?#
It covers attempts to make a person reveal information or perform an action. NIST SP 800-115 section 5.3 defines social engineering as "an attempt to trick someone into revealing information (e.g., a password) that can be used to attack systems or networks". It says the test can reveal weaknesses in user behavior "such as failing to follow standard procedures".
NIST names analog means (conversations in person or by telephone) and digital means (email, instant messaging). Phishing is the best known digital form. Providers sell these methods under several names:
| Method | What the tester does |
|---|---|
| Phishing | Sends crafted emails to a list of staff and records who clicks or enters data |
| Vishing | Calls staff or the help desk with a pretext |
| Smishing | Sends text messages with a link or request |
| On-site | Visits a site and tries to gain access; this overlaps with physical penetration testing |
The table does not split these methods. Open each provider page, or ask for a method list in writing.
Who needs a social engineering test, and when?#
Buyers need one when staff handle sensitive data or reset credentials, when a regulator or customer asks for awareness evidence, or after an incident that started with a phone call or an email. It also suits a company that already tested its network and applications and wants to learn whether an attacker could skip them by asking.
NIST says targets can be specific, such as executives, or a broad set of staff, and that specific targets are chosen when the organization knows of a threat to them. Decide which of the two you want before you request quotes.
What should you ask a social engineering testing provider?#
Ask these questions before signing:
- Which methods are in scope (email, phone, text, on-site), and which are excluded?
- Who approves the pretexts, and will you show us the scenarios first?
- How do you report: by named person, by team or by total?
- What happens when a staff member reports the attack? Do you stop?
- How do you store the data you collect, and when do you delete it?
- What actions are off limits (for example, real payments or access to real patient data)?
- Do you provide a sample report?
Rules of engagement matter more here than in a network test, because the targets are people. Get written authorization from the system owner. Our questions to ask a pentest provider covers general contract points.
What drives the price of a social engineering test?#
Price follows the number of targets, the number of methods, how much research each pretext needs, the length of the campaign and whether any on-site visit is in scope. Custom pretexts cost more than a template email. Reporting by individual adds data-handling work.
Most providers in the table quote after scoping, and a few list a price for a product or tier. Compare only after you fix the same method list and number of targets.
How should you read the table?#
Each row shows what that provider says on its own pages. "Not published" means we found no statement. The dataset shows human-led and hybrid delivery for this service. Check the provider page to see whether a person writes the pretexts, or a tool sends template campaigns.
The Sample report column matters here, because a report on social engineering can show how the provider treats employees. Prefer a provider that reports patterns and fixes over one that lists names.
What scoping mistakes do buyers make?#
Common mistakes:
- Telling no one in HR or legal, then facing complaints after the test.
- Running the test with no plan for a staff member who reports the attack.
- Allowing pretexts that use real events such as layoffs or illness, which can harm staff.
- Measuring only click rate, which says little about calls or visits.
- Keeping raw data for longer than the report needs.
See the pentest provider directory for other service types and the network penetration testing page for the technical side.
Questions
Is phishing simulation the same as social engineering penetration testing?
Phishing is one method. NIST SP 800-115 describes social engineering as tricking someone into revealing information that can be used to attack systems, by analog means (conversations, phone calls) or digital means (email, instant messaging). A phishing platform covers only the email part.
Who must approve a social engineering test?
The system owner must authorize it in writing. Many buyers also involve HR and legal, because the test touches employees. We found no standard that sets a fixed approver list, so agree it in the rules of engagement.
Do testers name employees who fall for a test?
That is a scope decision. Ask providers whether they report by individual or by group, and how they store the data. Many buyers choose group totals so staff are not blamed.
Do providers publish prices for these tests?
Most quote after scoping. The Published price column shows the pricing model, or the first listed price where one exists. Units differ, so ask for a total for the same scope.
Sources
- NIST SP 800-115: Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment (checked 9 November 2026)
- PentestCompare methodology and provider dataset (checked 9 November 2026)
Compare like with like
An automated scan, a manual test and annual credits are different units. Check scope, delivery and retest terms before price.