Mobile app penetration testing companies
Mobile application penetration testing checks an iOS or Android app and the backend it calls. This page lists providers whose own pages state mobile testing, A to Z, with published price, retest and sample report columns and the date each fact was checked. Ask each one for platforms, OWASP MASVS coverage, backend API scope and retest terms before you compare quotes.
Mobile application penetration testing companies describe the same service in very different words. Some name iOS and Android, some say "mobile" once in a list. The table lists providers whose own pages state mobile testing, in A to Z order with no ranking. Each row shows the facts we could source, and "Not published" where a provider says nothing. Facts were checked on 9 November 2026.
41 of 41 providers shown (67 in the full table). Sorted A to Z, not ranked. Checked up to 9 November 2026.
| Provider | Delivery | Web apps | APIs | Cloud | Network | Mobile | AI apps | Published price | Turnaround | Retest | Sample report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7ASecurityBoutique consultancy, Ireland | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Free fix verification: 'verify your fixes, suggest improvements and… | Public |
| AikidoApplication security platform, Multiple (United States, Belgium, United Kingdom) | automated | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | $4,000 per assessment +1 more | TYPICAL Pentest: same-day results. The AI pentest page also says a… | Free retesting for up to 6 months, including checks for bypasses of… | Public |
| Astra SecurityPTaaS platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $2,999 per year (card also shows $199 per month) +3 more | Manual pentest: 10-15 working days. Pentest Auto: first report the… | Re-scans included: Auto 1, Expert 2, Enterprise 4; window 30 days… | not published |
| Bishop FoxOffensive security consultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not published | Not published | Not published | not published |
| BreachLockPTaaS platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Pentests can be scoped and started within 24-48 hours. | Free manual retests: 1 (Standard), 2 (Extended), custom (Extensive).… | on request |
| BridewellCyber security services provider | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not published | on request |
| BugcrowdPTaaS platform, United States | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Tests launch in under 72 hours; Standard: launch within 3 business… | Standard: one year of retesting with one report revision, for web… | Public |
| ClaranetManaged services and cyber security provider | human-led | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Not published | Retesting is included as part of the engagement. | not published |
| CobaltPTaaS platform, United States | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $3,500 per test | Autonomous Pentest: findings in 24 hours. Annual tiers: start within… | Comparison table: free retesting for 6 months (Standard) or 12… | on request |
| Compass SecurityConsultancy, Switzerland | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not published | on request |
| Cure53Boutique consultancy, Germany | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | ? | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Not published | Not published. The site says assignments do not end with the report… | Public |
| Cyberis (Cyberis Reply)Penetration testing and cyber security consultancy | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not published | not published |
| CYBRIPenetration testing consultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $5,000 starts at, per engagement +3 more | From 5 business days (Web Application and Custom), 10 (Web, API,… | Remediation testing is included in the $9,500 and $20,000 tiers.… | not published |
| DeepStrikePenetration testing consultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Basic plan: start pentest within 48 hours. | The services page says free unlimited re-testing; the pricing page… | not published |
| DoyensecBoutique consultancy | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not stated on the homepage or company page. Some public reports are… | Public |
| HackerOneCrowdsourced platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Product page gives no start time or test length. HackerOne docs list… | Retesting is included after remediation. Docs say unlimited retests… | not published |
| Halo SecurityPTaaS platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Not published | One round of retesting is included; Halo verifies fixes and issues… | not published |
| Include SecurityApplication security consultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | Yes | ? | Not published | Report target: a week after the assessment conclusion. | Not published | not published |
| Integrity360Cyber security services provider, Ireland | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Not published | Continuous retest options are mentioned. | not published |
| LRQA (Nettitude)Assurance and cyber security provider (Nettitude is now part of LRQA) | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Mobile tests: start within two weeks and usually at least three days… | Not published | not published |
| NetSPIPenetration testing as a service (PTaaS) | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not published | Not published | Not published | not published |
| NoveeAutonomous testing platform | automated | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published. Testing is described as continuous. | Retests run automatically after fixes, and on new deployments, code… | not published |
| Outpost24PTaaS platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Snapshot is 10 days of manual testing and Assure is 3 days. SWAT… | Snapshot and Assure each include a 60-day retest window. SWAT checks… | not published |
| PacketlabsPenetration testing consultancy, Canada | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | The homepage says Packetlabs supports security teams with retesting;… | on request |
| ParameterAI-assisted testing service | automated | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | Custom quote | First findings in 24 hours; most runs finish the same day they start. | Free re-testing is listed for Single App and inherited by higher… | Public |
| PayatuSecurity consultancy, India | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $3,500 per test (starts from) +1 more | Not published | Re-validation of fixes: 1 round (Express, Critical and High), 1… | not published |
| Pen Test PartnersConsultancy | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | PTaaS: scoped within minutes and can start immediately; results in… | Not published | not published |
| Pentest PeoplePenetration testing provider (part of WorkNest Secure) | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not published | not published |
| PentiAI-assisted testing service | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $20 per month ($216 per year billed annually) +5 more | Pentests done in hours, not months (tagline). On the free first… | Every plan includes free unlimited retests. | not published |
| Prescient SecurityConsultancy | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | from $6,000 per engagement (scope-based) +5 more | Not published | Cait: up to 2 retests within 30 days of each scan. No retest terms… | not published |
| RaxisConsultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Custom quote | Quote requests answered usually in one business day; PTaaS findings… | Retesting is built into the PTaaS workflow; Raxis Attack includes… | Public |
| Rhino Security LabsPenetration testing firm, United States | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Not published | Not published | Not published | Public |
| SchellmanConsultancy, United States | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not stated on the page. | Public |
| Secure IdeasConsultancy | human-led | Yes | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | ? | $8,160 per test (flat fee, starting) +4 more | Testing usually starts two to four weeks after contracting; one to… | Not included by default; retesting is listed as a factor that can… | Public |
| SecuritumConsultancy, Poland | human-led | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 640 EUR to 890 EUR per man day +1 more | Not published. Typical engagement length is 1 to 4 weeks for a… | Not published | Public |
| Software SecuredConsultancy, Canada | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Quote within 48 hours; scheduling in 3-6 weeks, sometimes sooner;… | Request retesting within 12 months of report delivery;… | not published |
| StingraiPenetration testing consultancy and platform, Canada | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | US$3,000 per assessment +1 more | Autonomous Pentest: same-day results. | Automated retests are listed on the Autonomous plan; the page says… | Public |
| SynackCrowdsourced platform | hybrid | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | $5,085 per test (starting price) +2 more | Test windows: 4-5 business days (Sara), 5 days (SynackST), 14 days… | Patch verification is listed as included in each product; the… | not published |
| SySSConsultancy, Germany | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published. A Quick Penetration Test option can start right after… | A retest after fixes confirms the fixes work and checks for new… | not published |
| usd AGConsultancy, Germany | human-led | ? | ? | Yes | ? | Yes | Yes | Custom quote | Not published | Not published | not published |
| VumetricPenetration testing consultancy, Canada | human-led | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ? | Custom quote | Most penetration tests can be performed within a couple of days, but… | Not stated | on request |
No provider matches every filter. Remove a filter to see more.
"?" means the provider does not say on its public pages. It does not mean "no". Prices use each provider's own unit: a test, a year, a month or credits. Do not compare them as equal units. How we collect and check this data.
What does mobile app penetration testing cover?#
A mobile app penetration test examines the app on the device and the backend it talks to. Testers install a build, inspect local storage, intercept traffic, and try to read or change data they should not reach. The OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS) is the usual checklist. It groups app controls into eight areas: storage, cryptography, authentication and authorization, network communication, platform interaction, code quality, resilience against reverse engineering and tampering, and privacy.
The OWASP Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG) holds the test procedures for Android and iOS. A provider that cites MASVS areas in its reports lets you check coverage against a public list. The method itself is on the service sites. See web application penetration testing for the web side of the same job.
Who needs a mobile app pentest, and when?#
You need one when an app holds user data on the device, handles payments or sessions, or is the main way customers reach your service. Common triggers are a first store release, a new login method, a change to how the app stores tokens, and a customer security review.
A scan of the store listing or the binary does not replace a test. Authorization flaws live in the backend, so a test that stops at the app misses them. Pair the app test with an API penetration test or confirm the quote covers both.
What should you ask mobile pentest providers?#
Ask for these answers in writing before you sign. Each one should become a sentence in the scope document.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Which platforms and OS versions are in scope? | iOS and Android are separate builds with separate checks. |
| Is the backend API in scope, and with how many roles? | App tests that skip the API miss object and function level flaws. |
| Which MASVS areas do you test, and which do you skip? | A skipped area is a gap you should know about. |
| Do you test on rooted or jailbroken devices? | Runtime checks often need them. |
| How do you handle certificate pinning and root detection? | Testers may need a build with them off. |
| What does the retest cover and how long does it run? | Compare the Retest column below with the quote. |
Our guide questions to ask a pentest provider has the longer list.
What drives the price of a mobile app pentest?#
Price follows the number of platforms, the size of the app, the number of roles, the depth of runtime testing, whether the backend API is included, and the retest terms. Many providers quote after scoping. Some publish a unit price. Securitum, for example, lists 640 EUR to 890 EUR per man day on its pricing page, with the rate set by project length, team size and delivery mode.
The "Published price" column shows a figure only where a provider lists one, so a blank price is a missing fact and not a low price. See penetration testing cost for the ranges we sourced.
How do you read the table?#
Providers appear in the table when their own pages state mobile testing. The Web, API, Cloud and AI apps columns show "yes" only where the provider names that scope, and "unknown" means the pages we read did not say. The Sample report column says whether a report is public, on request or not published. Click a provider name for its sources and check date. Read how we compare for the rules.
The table does not split iOS from Android. Ask each provider directly, and compare the answer with the platforms you ship.
Which scoping mistakes cause rework?#
Three mistakes cause most change requests. Teams send a production build with pinning on and ask for a runtime test. Teams list the app but forget the backend. Teams give one test account when the app has several roles.
Demonstration
Demonstration only. Harbor Notes is a fictional app and no real customer system was tested. This is a sample scope sheet, not a quote.
| Item | Harbor Notes value |
|---|---|
| Platforms | iOS 17 and later, Android 13 and later |
| Builds | TestFlight invite, signed APK with pinning off |
| Roles | Member, workspace admin |
| Backend | https://api.example.com, OpenAPI file attached |
| Out of scope | Third-party analytics SDK servers |
| Retest | One round on Critical and High findings |
Compare other service pages in the directory when your app also exposes a cloud back end.
Questions
Is a mobile app pentest different from an API pentest?
Yes, in scope. A mobile test covers the app binary on the device, local storage and the traffic it sends. The backend API needs its own authorization tests. Ask whether the quote names the API as a line item or leaves it out.
Do testers need a jailbroken or rooted device?
Often, for runtime checks. The app owner should say whether jailbreak and root detection is in scope. Some teams ask for a test build with that detection off, so testers can reach the checks behind it.
What do I send a provider before a mobile test?
Send the build for each platform (IPA or APK, or a TestFlight invite), test accounts for each role, the backend base URL and any API spec. Add the minimum OS versions you support.
Does OWASP MASVS set the scope of a test?
It sets a checklist, not a scope. MASVS groups app controls into eight areas. A provider that maps findings to those areas gives you a shared language, but you still agree the platforms, roles and backend in writing.
Sources
- OWASP MAS: Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS) (checked 9 November 2026)
- OWASP MAS: Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG) (checked 9 November 2026)
- Securitum pricing (unit shown as man day) (checked 9 November 2026)
- PentestCompare provider dataset (each row links to its provider sources) (checked 9 November 2026)
Compare like with like
An automated scan, a manual test and annual credits are different units. Check scope, delivery and retest terms before price.