# NodeZero vs Pentera

Source: https://pentestcompare.com/compare/nodezero-vs-pentera/
Publisher: Excession Labs (pentestcompare.com)
Last updated: 2026-11-09

NodeZero vs Pentera compared from vendor pages checked 9 Nov 2026: NodeZero publishes per-asset prices, Pentera publishes none. Scope, retests and questions to ask.

> **Short answer:** NodeZero (Horizon3.ai) and Pentera both automate attacks against internal, external and cloud environments. NodeZero publishes list prices per asset ($15 to $85) and a web app price ($10,000 per app per test). Pentera publishes no price and sells by quote, with optional human-led services. Neither publishes a sample report or a turnaround time.

NodeZero vs Pentera is a comparison of two automated pentest platforms that aim at the same buyer: a security team that wants to test its own internal network, external surface and cloud often. The sharpest difference on public pages is price. Horizon3.ai publishes NodeZero list prices per asset, and Pentera publishes none. Everything below comes from vendor pages checked on 9 November 2026.

## How do NodeZero and Pentera compare at a glance?

| Field | Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery | Automated: software that runs the attacks; no human pentesters described | Hybrid: automated platform, plus human-led SECTOR11 Adversarial Testing and Security Validation Advisory |
| Scope named | Internal, external, cloud (AWS, Azure), Kubernetes, Active Directory; web apps via WebApp module; mobile not named | Core (internal), Surface (external) and Cloud modules, Resolve for remediation; AI-native web app and API testing; mobile not named |
| Pricing model | Published list prices | Custom quote |
| Published prices | Flex $15 per asset per test (12-month term). Core $50, Pro $65, Elite $85 per asset, annual subscription. WebApp Flex $10,000 per app per test | Not published |
| Turnaround | Not published as a time; WebApp page says tests can be set up quickly and run as often as needed | Not published |
| Retest terms | Fix actions with one-click verify; unlimited testing on Core, Pro, Elite; not stated for Flex | Remediation is followed by re-testing; FAQ says it revalidates fixes |
| Sample report | Not published | Not published |
| Credentials with evidence | None listed | None listed |
| Integrations | MCP Server | Integrations page linked; no partner named on the homepage |

Sources: [NodeZero pricing](https://horizon3.ai/use-case/pricing/), [NodeZero WebApp](https://horizon3.ai/nodezero/webapp/), [Pentera homepage](https://pentera.io/), checked 9 November 2026. Pentera's footer shows SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 and ISO 9001 badges without a certificate link, so we list none. Pentera's headquarters country is not published on the pages checked.

## Which should you choose, by need?

Both tools run attacks from software, so the choice comes down to how you buy and what else you need around them.

Choose NodeZero if:

- You want a list price you can turn into a budget once you count assets.
- You want unlimited testing for a fixed yearly price per asset (Core, Pro or Elite).
- You want a separate, priced web application module.

Choose Pentera if:

- You want an installed platform with separate modules for internal, external and cloud testing, and a remediation product, and you accept a quote-only price.
- You may want expert-led adversarial testing from the same vendor.
- Your team will book a demo before it asks for a number.

If you need only web applications and APIs, a different category fits better. See [XBOW vs Horizon3 NodeZero](/compare/xbow-vs-horizon3/) and [automated pentesting tools](/guides/automated-pentesting-tools/).

## Where do they differ on price units and quotes?

Horizon3's unit is a discovered asset: a server, device, cloud resource or service. A machine found under several names counts once. Flex is billed per asset per test, and the three subscriptions are billed per asset per year. Support tiers cost extra (Enhanced 10% of the subscription with a $7,500 yearly minimum, Premier 20% with a $25,000 minimum). Our [NodeZero pricing page](/pricing/horizon3/) works through the arithmetic.

Pentera's homepage offers only "Talk to an Expert" and demo booking. Its "60%" claim about third-party pentest cost is a marketing claim, not a price. Pentera's unit is not published, so nothing can be multiplied.

This asymmetry has a practical effect. You can build a rough NodeZero budget before you speak to sales. For Pentera you cannot, and you should ask for the same list of terms from both: asset or module count, term length, support tier and renewal rule.

## Where do they differ on scope and retesting?

Both vendors describe internal, external and cloud testing. Horizon3's pages also name Kubernetes and Active Directory, and its WebApp page describes a web application module sold per app. Pentera's pages describe three modules by network zone, and AI-native web app and API testing. Neither names mobile testing.

On retesting, Horizon3 attaches a one-click verify to each fix action. On Core, Pro and Elite, retests carry no extra charge because testing is unlimited. For Flex, the page does not say whether a verify counts as a new billed test. Pentera says remediation is followed by re-testing and that its FAQ revalidates fixes. It states no limit or fee.

Neither vendor publishes a sample report. You can judge the evidence quality only in a trial, so ask both to run the same scoped target and compare what each report proves. The [AI vs human pentesting guide](/guides/ai-vs-human-pentesting/) explains where automated output stops.

## What should you ask both vendors?

1. Which asset types, modules or apps are in scope for the price?
2. How is the count made, and what happens when it grows during the term?
3. Is a retest after a fix billed, limited or unlimited?
4. What is the time from signed order to the first test, and to the report?
5. Can we see a sample report and a trial result on a target we choose?
6. Which actions can the platform take on production, and how do we set limits and stop them?
7. Is a human involved in checking findings, and what do they deliver?

## Related comparisons

See [Pentera alternatives](/compare/pentera-alternatives/), [XBOW vs Horizon3 NodeZero](/compare/xbow-vs-horizon3/), the [NodeZero pricing page](/pricing/horizon3/) and the [provider dataset](/providers/).

Found an error? [Send a correction](/methodology/#corrections).

## Questions

### Is NodeZero cheaper than Pentera?

The public pages cannot answer that. NodeZero lists $15 to $85 per asset, and a total depends on your asset count. Pentera lists no price and offers only a demo or a talk with an expert. Compare written quotes for the same scope.

### Do both test web applications?

Both vendors' pages describe web application testing. Horizon3 sells a WebApp module at $10,000 per app per test. Pentera describes AI-native web app and API testing, and publishes no price for it.

### Do both support retesting after a fix?

Yes, in different words. Horizon3's findings include fix actions with one-click verify, and Core, Pro and Elite allow unlimited testing. Pentera's FAQ says it revalidates fixes. Neither page states a fee, so ask.

### Which one gives a signed report from a human tester?

Neither page describes one. NodeZero is software with no human pentesters described. Pentera is hybrid: it also sells human-led SECTOR11 Adversarial Testing and Security Validation Advisory services. Ask Pentera what those deliver.

## Sources

- [NodeZero pricing](https://horizon3.ai/use-case/pricing/)
- [NodeZero WebApp](https://horizon3.ai/nodezero/webapp/)
- [Horizon3.ai homepage](https://www.horizon3.ai/)
- [Pentera homepage](https://pentera.io/)
- [Pentera contact and offices](https://pentera.io/contact-us/)